Poster Presentation: a2 National Symposium 2026
Title: Biomarkers of Aging to Discover Geroprotectors in Cross-Sectional Biobank Data Authors: Chris Dietrich and Jesse R. Poganik
Title: Biomarkers of Aging to Discover Geroprotectors in Cross-Sectional Biobank Data Authors: Chris Dietrich and Jesse R. Poganik
Title: Leveraging Digital Cognitive Rhythms to Detect ADRD Risk in Family Caregivers Authors: Yeonsu Song, Alexander Demos, Alexandra Konig, Raeanne Moore
Title: TRIALCHAT: Development of an AI Agent Companion to Encourage Participation in ADRD Clinical Trail Authors: Tim Mackey, Joshua Yang, Tiana McMann, Mingxiang Cai, Zhuoran Li, Jiawei Li, Qing Xu
Title: Wearable Heart Failure Socks for Exacerbation and Response to Treatment Monitoring Authors: Pamela Cacchione and Li Shen
Title: Voiceitt: AI- Enable Speech Recognition for Older Adults with Severe Dysarthria Authors: Katie Seaver and Rachel Khasky-Levy
Presented virtually at ARPA-H BIOGAMI on February 20th, 2026 Source: https://arpa-h.gov/explore-funding/programs/biogami
Authors: Mehrdad Dadgostar, Lindsay C. Hanford, Maryam Tavakoli, Steven E. Arnold, David H. Salat, Tatiana Sitnikova, Pia Kivisakk Webb, Jordan R. Green, Hengru Liu, Brian D. Richburg, Mariam Tkeshelashvili, Marziye Eshghi Abstract INTRODUCTION We tested whether spontaneous speech acoustics provide a scalable digital marker of biologically defined Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk. METHODS Forty-nine cognitively unimpaired older adults were stratified within APOE genotype into Low-, Moderate-, and High-Risk groups based on log₁₀-transformed plasma p-tau217. Acoustic features were extracted from spontaneous speech and entered into multiclass SVM classifiers with leave-one-out cross-validation, with and without genetic-algorithm feature selection and age. Parallel models using neuropsychological measures were evaluated for comparison. Feature contributions were interpreted using SHAP. RESULTS Speech-based models substantially outperformed cognition-only models and exceeded chance performance for three-group classification (33.3%), achieving up to 77% accuracy compared with 47%…